![\"Bloom-Taxonomy-GetSmarter-Knowledge-Commons_Part-3\"](\"https:\/\/www.getsmarter.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Bloom-Taxonomy-GetSmarter-Knowledge-Commons_Part-3.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Determining the true goal of a good education is difficult. Should an accumulation of knowledge be sufficient to justify a qualification? If a student can recite facts verbatim, is that enough to deem them qualified for a certain career? Where does that leave critical thinking skills or practical, creative skills? As Part 1<\/a> and Part 2<\/a> of this blog series demonstrated, learning at the level of recollection and understanding alone is not enough to indicate that a student has achieved a tangible learning outcome.<\/p>\n Furthermore, in the particular educational space in which GetSmarter functions \u2013 that of providing applicable workplace skills for career growth \u2013 the need for students to gain practical skills from their participation on short courses is paramount. For this reason, learning is scaffolded beyond the level of Analyse, and through the levels of Evaluate and Create, as defined by Bloom\u2019s Revised Taxonomy.<\/p>\n What is a tangible outcome? How does it support practical learning, or applied learning? According to Saenger (2013)<\/a>, a tangible outcome relates to specific artefacts or products that \u201crecord, prompt, and reinforce student engagement with key course material\u201d. Here, the emphasis falls on the physical evidence of a given learning outcome. For example, a student may be required to map out a line graph on paper or in MS Excel, or they may be required to write an essay on a specific topic. The creation of these artefacts demonstrate higher-order thinking skills required at the Evaluate and Create levels. The benefits of this are two-fold.<\/p>\n Firstly, any task where a student is required to work with something tangible is bound to be assessing the student on the higher levels of Bloom\u2019s. Designing a learning path to end with a creative or evaluative task ensures that students are scaffolded to the top of Bloom\u2019s. When students are required to physically create something, they will naturally begin to apply the learning they have gained along the way, through the previous levels, in the creation task.<\/p>\n Secondly, and especially so in a market catering to working professionals, these kinds of tasks create demonstrable evidence of learning. If, for example, a student is able to walk away from a unit or module with a carefully marked-up document, or indeed one which they themselves have created, they are able to clearly show what they have learnt. These are often referred to as portfolios of evidence and are useful for students and educators alike.<\/p>\n Figure 1:<\/strong> In the UCT GSB Values-based Leadership short course, students complete a PDF document that functions as a portfolio of evidence once they have completed the course.<\/p>\n Before a student reaches the level of Create they should be able to perform tasks at the level of Evaluate. Some of the verbs associated with Evaluate are:<\/p>\n As is evident from the above list of verbs, the focus of learning outcomes at the level of Evaluate is on the student\u2019s ability to make informed decisions and suggestions based on a given set of information. At the previous level of Analyse, the requirement is simply to gather and organise information, as well as understand it. However, once the student reaches Evaluate, they are now required to synthesise this information and make decisions based on previous learnings and conceptual understanding.<\/p>\n Following our example from Parts 1 and 2 of this blog series, imagine our guitar student is now tasked with creating a musical mash-up for an upcoming performance. They are provided with two pieces of music and are asked to combine them in a creative way. The learning outcomes for such a task could be:<\/p>\n In this playful scenario, the student is required to use the musical theory knowledge they have gained up to this point to make informed decisions about how two songs could be combined without causing listeners auditory distress.<\/p>\n The ability to evaluate also aids students in achieving outcomes at the Create level. Consider this example, which could form part of the learning outcomes of a course in business strategy:<\/p>\n As the above indicates, verbs at the level of Create take the final step beyond evaluation and require students to apply their learning in the most practical way possible.<\/p>\n As mentioned above, assessment tasks at the level of Create are likely to result in some kind of tangible outcome, with the goal being to raise students\u2019 learning beyond conceptual knowledge alone and into practical application.<\/p>\n In our musical example, the outcome is a playable piece of music (assuming the student has been adequately scaffolded across Bloom\u2019s). In the financial predictions example, the outcome is a strategy to maximise profits. In each case, the student is required to do more than simply make propositions about what can be done in a given scenario or to understand the various concepts and theories involved, but to actually do something. Some of the verbs associated with the Create level are:<\/p>\n Each of these results in something tangible. It is at this point that both the student and the tutor can begin to feel assured that the course goals and learning outcomes have been achieved.<\/p>\n Bloom\u2019s Revised Taxonomy is one of the most useful tools in the arsenal of an instructional designer, or indeed any educator. When the goal of learning is to see tangible outcomes and practical, applicable skills, the Taxonomy provides a structured and clear system for scaffolding students along a carefully-designed learning path. The use of specific verbs allows for clear outcomes and the method of scaffolding means that students are guided towards learning goals rather than thrown in at the deep end.<\/p>\n From Remember to Create, students are led towards a tangible outcome with the potential of serving as a portfolio of evidence, and in conclusion of their studies, can be confident in their ability to perform.<\/p>\n View over 60 online short courses from the GetSmarter course portfolio.<\/p>\n Further reading:<\/strong><\/p>\n Saenger, T.L. 2013. Creating tangible outcomes. Available: https:\/\/wikis.utexas.edu\/display\/TAwiki\/Creating+tangible+outcomes [2016, January 9]<\/a>.<\/p>\n Lorenzo, G. and Ittelson, J. 2005. \u2018Demonstrating and assessing student learning with e-portfolios.\u2019 In Educase Learning Initiative Paper 3: 2005. Available: https:\/\/net.educause.edu\/ir\/library\/pdf\/ELI3003.pdf [2016, January 10]<\/a>.<\/p>\n Macquarie University Learning and Teaching Centre. n.d. Writing learning outcomes. Available: https:\/\/sydney.edu.au\/education-portfolio\/ei\/assessmentresources\/pdf\/link12.pdf [2016, January 10]<\/a>.<\/p>\nTangible outcomes<\/strong><\/h4>\n
![\"Blooms_Taxonomy_Research_Hub\"](\"https:\/\/www.getsmarter.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Blooms_Taxonomy_Research_Hub.png\")
<\/p>\nEvaluate<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n
Create<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\nWant to gain certifiable expertise from world-leading universities?<\/h5>\n
BROWSE SHORT COURSES<\/a><\/strong><\/h5>\n
\n<\/h5>\n